Approve the task and required access.
Own the task, the systems it may affect and the point at which human judgment is required.
Assign an owner to each agent, define its permitted actions and review policy exceptions. Keep a record of who acted, what was requested and what policy decided.
AI agent governance defines who is responsible for an agent, what authority it receives, which actions require review and what evidence the organization keeps. Effective governance connects these decisions to the systems where the agent actually acts.
Name the accountable workflow owner.
Define the systems and actions in scope.
Apply policy at the local boundary.
Assign an exception reviewer.
Keep a verifiable decision record.
Your team assigns these responsibilities. Oktsec supplies policy controls and decision records; your people approve access and accept risk.
Own the task, the systems it may affect and the point at which human judgment is required.
Configure identities, tools, parameters and destinations; validate that governed actions cross the enforcement point.
Assign decision authority, review changes and connect the technical record to the organization’s assurance process.
Name the task and its authority. A shared login or a broad “AI approved” label cannot describe which tools, destinations or privileged actions are permitted. A specific scope gives engineering something it can enforce.
A blocked request or missing evidence needs a defined owner and next step. The review should establish whether the request is legitimate and whether any change to authority is justified.
Identify the agent, requested action, applied policy and reason for the exception.
The assigned reviewer decides the next step. A failed request does not automatically earn broader access.
If the policy changes, retain the version and review the evidence from subsequent actions.
Identity, request, decision and policy version let a team inspect what the enforcement point evaluated. Hash chains and configured signatures support independent integrity verification.
Verify evidence offlineOwners, risk acceptance, retention and audit requirements belong in your governance process. Integrity of a technical record is different from proving regulatory compliance.
Explore all seven framework mappingsPublished mappings identify selected technical coverage. They do not confer certification, conformity or regulatory approval.
New tools, credentials and destinations can change what an agent can do. Recheck permissions and test the affected actions before expanding access.
Inventory tells you what exists. Governance also needs ownership, bounded authority, policy enforcement, exception handling and evidence of the resulting decisions.
Local Control enforcement makes the runtime decision. Cloud coordinates policy and evidence across environments; it does not replace the local boundary.
No. Published mappings connect controls to framework requirements. Certification, conformity and legal conclusions require their own assessment and evidence.
Bring the workflow owner and security team. We will review access, enforcement options and the records needed for oversight.